Where Bollywood Comes Alive
Posts tagged theatres
Did SRK’s remark cross legal line?
Feb 13th

Kartikeya | TNN (THE TIMES OF INDIA; February 12, 2010)
Mumbai: Did Shah Rukh Khan abuse his freedom of speech and expression when he regretted the Pakistani cricketers’ exclusion from the IPL? Legal experts said like all other freedoms guaranteed by law, even the freedom to express an opinion was bound by reasonable restrictions.
Khan could have abused the freedom of speech and expression he has been guaranteed under the Indian law only if he had said something that compromised the security of the state, affected India’s relations with a foreign country, was contemptuous of a court of law or directly created public disorder, said legal experts.
Advocate Y P Singh said Khan’s statements did not appear to cross any line and anyone familiar with the constitutional law would have known that the current fuss was absolutely unnecessary. What the actor expressed while speaking about Pakistani cricketers in the IPL was an opinion, and he had exercised a fundamental freedom guaranteed to him by one of the most sacrosanct parts of the Indian Constitution.
Freedom of speech and expression written under Article 19 (1) (a) has been fiercely defended at various times by the Supreme Court in the last 60 years of our republic. Two decades ago in 1989, the Supreme Court said in the Rangarajan vs P Jagjivan Ram case that “free debate’’ and “open discussion’’ were an “integral part of a democracy’’. Even before that, in a 1950 case, then Chief Justice Patanjali Shastri had said, “Freedom of speech lies at the foundation of all democratic organisations, for without free political discussion no public education—so essential for the proper functioning of the process of popular government—is possible’’.
“Freedom of speech and expression, like all others, is bound by reasonable restrictions, but if an opinion does not violate them, then it is fine,’’ said advocate Mubin Solkar.
Singh said, “The freedom of speech is a fundemantal right, which political parties have often tried to trample on, but the courts have never allowed it. It is the basic feature of the Constitution and an inalienable right, something that parties looking for shortterm gain do not respect.’’
A recent Supreme Court judgment (2002) even laid down that freedom of speech and expression included the “right to impart and receive information, which, in turn, included freedom to hold opinions’’. In the same order, the judges had said having an uninformed citizenry in the country would make our democracy “a farce’’.
Besides infringing on one’s right to express his opinion, when a movie is not allowed to
run in theatres, it also takes a toll on the livelihood of the hundreds of technicians, artistes and theatre workers associated with it. Film-making, distribution and screening are essential aspects of the business and all of them are affected when a movie faces opposition during its release. Moreover, when a theatre is vandalised, the offenders trample over yet another constitutional right of the citizens—that of holding property under Article 300 (A).
Cinemas cowed down by threat from Sena
Feb 12th
Multiplexes & Malls More Worried About Damage To Property Than Profits From Film
Bharati Dubey | TNN (THE TIMES OF INDIA; February 12, 2010)
Mumbai: Despite assurances from the Maharashtra government and the police that adequate protection would be given to cinema halls screening ‘My Name Is Khan’, multiplex owners and theatres across the state have decided not to screen the Shah Rukh Khan starrer on the first day of its release on Friday.
Each of Mumbai’s 70 cinemas were expected to rake in about Rs 2 lakh a day. But exhibitors were not worried so much about losing that amount as they were worried about losing money due to damage to property. The latter, they think, would be costlier and more of an annoyance in the long run.
About 90% of multiplexes are situated on leased property and mall owners, too, are in no mood to bear losses for the sake of a film’s release. Exhibitor and distributor Ramesh Sippy said, “If a film like ‘My Name Is Khan’ does not release on the first day, the minimum loss for a day would be around Rs 3 crore (for all Mumbai multiplexes), but the potential damage to property is what is working on the exhibitors’ minds. At present, a multiplex like Inox is situated in such a location (Nariman Point) that if the front of the property is damaged the multiplex would be unable to pay the reimbursement. So most of the multiplexes have decided against releasing the film in the present scenario.’’
Multiplex owners are reportedly under pressure from mall owners who are in no mood to incur any losses due to damage. The owner of a mall in the western suburbs said, “We really don’t have faith in the police force. They will do nothing if the Sena comes and vandalises our property.’’
Multiplexes have had several meetings with the police, chief minister and home minister and remain under pressure from the government to release the film, but most of them said they have no faith in the police force. An industry source said that the multiplexes have been told that if they don’t release ‘…Khan’, they shouldn’t release any other film. Another industry source said, “The government even told multiplex owners that if there is any damage, the state would compensate them. But even that did not convince them to release the film.’’
Vishal Kapoor, chief operations officer, Fun Cinemas, said, “All of us decided not to screen the film tomorrow as the environment is not healthy. We will wait and watch for the scene to get better.’’
Sippy added, “There are so many multiplexes whose screens were torn. To replace a screen is not only expensive, but the owners lose business for two to three weeks because screens are not of standard size and are made to order.’’
Manoj Desai, managing director of G-7 multiplex, Bandra West), has already planned to replace ‘My Name Is Khan’ with the Anthony Hopkins film ‘The Wolfman’. He said, “I have incurred a loss of Rs 3 lakh. The screen of my Maratha Mandir was torn down on Wednesday evening. I just cannot afford to take more losses.’’
On Wednesday, most multiplex chains were also complaining that, while their halls were provided full security in Mumbai, their cinema halls outside the city did not have any police cover, which they have pointed out to the police and state.
Meanwhile Sippy also said, “Audiences would certainly not want to enter a cinema hall and watch a film surrounded by cops.’’
Hope better sense prevails: SRK
Feb 11th
Jittery Theatres Don’t Offer Advance Bookings For Shah Rukh’s ‘My Name Is Khan’ Despite Govt’s Promise Of Security
Bharati Dubey | TNN (THE TIMES OF INDIA; February 11, 2010)
Mumbai: On the eve of the release of one of his biggest films, actor Shah Rukh Khan was reportedly living in hope in Abu Dhabi that the controversy surrounding the Friday release in Mumbai would be resolved shortly. Khan was in Abu Dhabi for Wednesday night’s premiere of the film there.
“I hope better sense prevails in Mumbai. We have worked really hard on the movie and we just want people to watch the movie,” Shah Rukh said at a press conference in Abu Dhabi. ‘My Name is Khan’ has a budget of about Rs 50 crore and was bought by Foxstar Studio for distribution for Rs 90 crore. Generally, about 35% of the all-India business comes from the Mumbai territory. But trade analyst Amod Mehra said, “‘My Name is Khan’ is more of a multiplex film and being a Shah Rukh Khan film nearly 45 to 50% of the all-India revenue could come from the Mumbai territory. It is estimated that the business the film could do in the Mumbai territory could be at least Rs 10 crore to Rs 12 crore in the first week of release. Besides, it is Shah Rukh Khan who has always given the maximum business and no exhibitor wants to miss the chance this time too.’’
The revenue sharing between the exhibitors and distributors for the film is 50:50. With the industry incurring losses of nearly Rs 150 crore in January, exhibitors have been looking forward to the release of ‘My Name is Khan’. A multiplex source said, “Unfortunately, because of the trouble, we have not been able to open the advance booking of the film in Mumbai, but the film’s advance booking in other place is extremely good.’’
Some multiplexes which opened advance bookings on Tuesday had to stop after the Sena went on a rampage against cinemas in the western suburbs. The multiplexes had a conference call with Khan and the distributors of the film.
The police have promised extra security, including guards near screens, but exhibitors are reeling under the fear spread by the Sena. An exhibitor of a national multiplex chain said, “If the problem does not end by 12 noon on Thursday, it will be difficult to screen the film in Mumbai on Friday morning. One hopes the issue is resolved soon.’’
Interestingly, the losses may not be complete for the distributors. Sources insist that they must have insured the film against rioting and political strikes. However, if the film does not release on Friday, cinema halls will face losses that cannot be regained. A source said, “The first weekend of business is very crucial for cinema halls as the business of entertainment is mainly in the first two weeks.’’
About 70 cinema halls are scheduled to screen the film in Mumbai and each would earn a minimum of Rs 2 lakh per day. A distributor would get about Rs 60 lakh a day and the government about Rs 30 lakh a day.
Director of an insurance firm, Aaatur Thakkar, said, “The expected loss in ticketing revenue can be covered for distributors. Movies like ‘3 Idiots’ are covered by us similarly and the Telengana issue triggered claims from big movies. Now, more cinema halls are getting cover.’’
In Navi Mumbai, while there is heavy deployment of police, cinema managements have decided to stay clear of political controversy and are not opening advance bookings. “We have assured all cinema theatres of their safety. From our side, there will not be any law and order problem in Navi Mumbai,’’ said DCP Dattatray Shinde.
The film is releasing in Pakistan. Nine prints sent there will show in places like Lahore, Karachi and Rawalpindi.
—With inputs from Vijay Singh and agencies
Multiplexes in Mumbai stop MNIK bookings
Feb 10th
With the Shiv Sena going on the rampage against the theatres screening My Name Is Khan, the sudden and violent change of stance after indicating a truce has shocked the film industry.
Several Sena dominated pockets of the city including Mulund, Kanjurmarg, Ghatkopar and Chembur witnessed attacks on theatres planning to screen My Name Is Khan. Huma Adlabs, Shreyas, Ashish and Metro were among the theatres attacked.
Yesterday, the film’s producer Karan Johar met up with Police Commissioner D Sivanandan to discuss the situation. While the police has warned of strict action against troublemakers and over 200 arrests were made on Tuesday, the situation remains volatile. And bearing the brunt are the theatres.
“We are waiting to hear from the distributors (Fox Cinemas) to take an official stand on whether or not to go ahead with the release of My Name Is Khan. It is as much their decision as ours,” said Shunali Shroff of Fame Big Cinemas, adding, “Hopefully, by Wednesday morning, things should get resolved.”
Devang Sampat, GM Marketing, Cinemax said, “We are yet to take a call on this. I have still to speak to the operation team since this is more of an operation call.”
Meanwhile, in an interview to a television channel, Shah Rukh Khan said that while he has had a warm relationship with Bal Thackeray and Uddhav Thackeray, he didn’t feel there was anything he had said which he should apologise for. He also said that he had not sought any appointment with them to sort out the issue.
It may be recalled that the Shiv Senas had taken an objection to Shah Rukh’s comment that Pakistani cricket players should be allowed to play in the IPL.
At the time of going to press, representatives from all the multiplexes were in a meeting with Chief Minister Ashok Chavan to find a solution to the impasse.
SRK flick will get cop cover
Feb 2nd
Mani D’Mello | TNN (THE TIMES OF INDIA; February 2, 2010)
Mumbai: Even as police commissioner D Sivanandhan assured the city that “no attacks on theatres screening actor Shah Rukh Khan’s yet-to-be released film My Name is Khan will be tolerated,” exhibitors and distributors Shringar Films Ltd are believed to have written a letter to Shiv Sena chief Bal Thackeray stating that they will not be releasing the movie unless it is cleared by him.
However, when contacted, company director B Shroff refused to comment. Officially the release date of the film (Feb 12) remains unchanged.
On Monday, CM Ashok Chavan and home minister R R Patil discussed the issue with the police.
Atul Kulkarni-Flexing his feminine side
Feb 1st
By Vishwas Kulkarni (MUMBAI MIRROR; January 31, 2010)
He is currently the toast of Marathi cinema for his critically-acclaimed role in Natrang, a smash Marathi indie about the trials and tribulations of a tamasha nachya.
An impoverished day labourer, who doubles up as an amateur wrestler, transforms from being the village pehelwan to a nachya, the stock effeminate comedian in a tamasha troupe.
The film chronicles the artiste’s anguished journey from prejudice to popular acclaim. The success of Natrang has suddenly created a buzz around the world of Marathi cinema. Competing with biggies such as Avatar and 3 Idiots, both monstrous blockbusters, Natrang has become a case study for a successful Marathi flick.
From one screening a day on Day One to two screenings a day on Day Two, to three screenings a day on Day Three at Eros, the film has reached a far wider audience than anticipated; in fact after almost a month’s run it is even coming out with subtitled prints. And its lead actor Atul Kulkarni has been happy to host trails for the latest feather in his cap.
Excerpts from an interview:
How did you accept this role?
I have a simple rule. I usually respond to the script. When I initially received the bound screenplay (an entire entourage starring Nikhil Sane from Zee Talkies, director Ravi Jadhav, the producer, the cinematographer, landed up at my house to convince me, something I found very touching). But I still had to get into the idea. On reading the screenplay, I took it on.
Wasn’t the sheer physicality of being a village pehelwan and then transforming into a lithe nachya in a tamasha troupe overwhelming?
The idea of an actor gaining weight and then losing it for the same character has not been done, at least as far I know. So that excited me tremendously. I actually put on 15 kgs and then lost 17 kgs – all in a matter of seven months. While gaining weight I was still completing two other films on hand. But after the initial two months, I was exclusively working on the role of Guna in Natrang. There was no option to ration out time to anything else but this role.
What about the emotionality of the role?
I came to the internal journey only after I had become the role physically. The largest challenge was physical. That said, the internal journey of Guha is an anguished one; from an amateur wrestler to wanting to become a king in a play to eventually becoming a nachya in a tamasha troupe is a wide arc. Then there is the spectrum of relationships and social environment that keeps shifting dramatically.
All this makes the character extremely dynamic. The spine of the character though is about achieving one’s dreams in the modern context. And I think that was the constant strain emotionally throughout the many transformations of the character.
Did you look at any stock nachyas from popular culture like Ganpat Patil, someone who made his entire filmic career out of being a pansy on the tamasha stage.
I saw many of Ganpat Patil’s films, but I see Guna in a far different light. Ganpat Patil was a stock character; he was a nachya on stage and off the stage in all his films. Guna has a wider spectrum, emotionally and physically to play with. There are many more nuances to his persona.
The second half of the film is replete with how viciously society responds to Guna’s feminine side. There is even a homosexual rape sequence that is rather disturbing.
Natrang invokes many gender politics. How a man should be, how a woman should be, when these definitions are not conformed to, society can respond extremely problematically. Natrang challenges stock perceptions.
What has led to the spate of intelligent, out-of-the-box Marathi cinema of late?
There are three reasons: the multiplex has created a milieu where an average middle class man or woman can take his or her family to watch a film. This was not the case earlier, because the theatres that showed Marathi films were not the sort of places you’d take your family to on a day out.
The Marathi middle class, both lower and upper, today has the capacity to spend; education levels have gone up. So watching good cinema in your mother tongue has begun to constitute a valid recreational possibility.
![]() |
| Pic: Sachin Haralkar |
Secondly, a new generation of filmmakers such as Umesh Kulkarni and Sachin Kundalkar, who have actually been trained in the craft, has emerged. In my time, it was a big deal for someone from a middle class family in Sholapur to announce that he is not going to be an engineer or a doctor.
My family was shattered to learn that I was going to enter theatre. Today a family is not shattered if they learn that their child is going to invest his career in something other than engineering or medicine. Thirdly, corporates such as Zee Talkies are taking on regional cinema with an entrepreneurial spirit that is genuine. They have not only brought in audiences, they have actually created them, perhaps because they have had the vision to foresee this trend.
So is it a viable industry today?
No, I’d wait and watch before making such a sweeping statement. We are still a far cry from being an independent industry. The number of films that are doing well are still rather limited. But that said, the trend has caught on. It’s the thing these days, they say, for a builder to shell out some loose cash to make a quick regional film! However, quality is going to be a crucial indicator.
Marathi films will have to deliver; only comedies cannot be the stock-in-trade. The over-emphasis on comedies of the Ashok Saraf-Laxmikant Berde genre, merged with the negative impact of television in the early ’90s, proved to be the death knell for the Marathi film industry then. Then again, filmmaking remains a gamble. You’re only assuming that an audience will like what you’re creating.
But what we have in our favour this time round is a bunch of good writers, better creativity. So with a budget of 60-70 lakhs, you’re in good hands. With 1.5 crore you’d still pull through with some luck. Anything above that is like the Bollywood game!
Speaking of Bollywood, you’ve pretty much anchored yourself in it. Have you ever considered television offers when the going gets tough?
No, thankfully, my plate is full with acting roles. Television is not an option because I am not the sort of person who enjoys working 365 days of the year. Work is a small part of my life; it is not my life. And I have a life!
So Bollywood and Marathi films it is.
Fenil’s Bollywood Talk # 84
Jan 21st
WILL VEER BE A BIGGER HIT THAN WANTED?
The stage is set. Veer is ready to release tomorrow. The timing of the film is excellent. After 3 Idiots, all the films that arrived (Dulha Mil Gaya, Pyaar Impossible, Chance Pe Dance) had failed to bring audiences to theatres. People have money in their pockets but hadn’t spent and so majority might invest in Veer! Then there’s a holiday on Tues Jan 26 (Republic Day) and so the film has an extra day besides the 3-day weekend to amass profits.
Besides the aforementioned reasons, the most important factor that goes in favour of Veer is that it presents Salman Khan as an action hero. The last time he went around bashing up baddies in Wanted, audiences went crazy and the film became a super-hit. Something similar is expected for Veer too. Salman has a considerable fan base among masses who love to watch him in action and comedy films. Also, this is the first time that Salman is acting in a historic saga. Not to forget, Sallu himself has penned the story of the film too, which has aroused tremendous curiosity!
However, a sizeable number of factors go against Veer too. To begin with, it’s a period film which might put the audiences away notwithstanding Salman’s presence. Secondly, the film is too long (close to 3 hours). Thirdly, a lot of money has been pumped in and hence, the film’s costs are high and might be difficult to recover.
The film has to be really very well made in order to sustain in theatres and cover its costs. If you ask me, I am adopting ‘wait-and-watch’ strategy. I’ll go for it if it gets a good response. I burnt my fingers last week by watching Chance Pe Dance and don’t want to repeat the same folly again!
What are your views on Veer? Do let me know!
————————————
TERA KYA HOGA JOHHNY KA KYA HOGA?!
Sudhir Mishra is angry. His upcoming film Tera Kya Hoga Johnny starring Neil Mukesh, Soha Ali Khan, Kay Kay Menon and Shahana Goswami was out on YouTube. Mumbai Mirror published about it yesterday and Mishra and his team got into action. By the time I checked YouTube yesterday in the afternoon, the film which was uploaded in 12 parts was removed. But someone had downloaded the first 2 parts and re-uploaded on YouTube which wasn’t removed. Hence, I got to see the first few minutes of the film. The print is not quite great and it’s definitely an unedited version. Regarding the film, it looks like a cross between Slumdog Millionaire and Black Friday!
Although the film will be completely flushed out from YouTube in 2 days, it won’t be of much help. The film is also uploaded on torrent download sites and hence, anyone who wants to see the film can simply search there and copy it onto their PCs/laptops. This is really tragic but this is what happens when people don’t release their films on time and instead let it lie in cans for years. Somebody will surely come and make a copy of it. Also, again, an insider is involved here but it seems no effort will be done to track down the miscreant.
A month back, Vikram Bhatt also got a similar shock when his upcoming film Phirr (*ing Rajneesh Duggal, Adah Sharma, Roshni Chopra) was out on torrent websites. What is shocking is that Phirr is slated to release in June and before its release, Bhatt will be releasing his other flick Shaapit (*ing Aditya Narayan) somewhere in Feb or March. Hence, Shaapit should have been out on the net but instead, Phirr made it! Again, the print available was the unedited version and Bhatt feels that the print is of such a bad quality that it won’t affect the theatrical collections. Let’s see!
‘A’ rated Ishqiya promo screened in ‘U’ rated films?
Jan 19th
The trailer of Ishqiya, which has a splattering of foul language and has an A certficate, is being shown in many theatres along with Ken Ghosh’s latest film Chance pe Dance, which has a U certificate.
The language has made movie going families cringe. Says a source, “Chance pe Dance draws a lot of kids to the theatres. Naturally, their parents are very upset about them seeing promos liberally peppered with abusive language. They may not have minded it if the trailer was the same which is being shown on television, because that version does not have cuss words.”
Explaining why Ishqiya had two trailers, one for theatres and the other for television, Censor Board Regional Officer Vinayak Azad said, “We can’t have a promo with filthy language being shown in the drawing rooms. We have a sense of responsibility.”
![]() |
![]() |
| Ishqiya |
But can action be taken for screening the less palatable trailer during Chance pe Dance? Azad said emphatically, “No theatre is supposed to show the theatrical trailer of Ishqiya in a U or even a U/A movie. That trailer is permitted for screening only in an A film. It’s a complete violation of the act. The police can take action.”
However, Azad said that he is not sure if the producers of Ishqiya (Vishal Bhardwaj and Shemaroo) or Chance pe Dance (UTV) can be blamed for this. “Lekin theatres to definitely galat kar rahen hain agar Ishqiya ka trailer Chance pe Dance mein dikha rahe hain.”
Manoj Desai (of Gaiety-Galaxy), for one, claimed that he was in the dark about what version of the trailer was being screened inside his theatres. He asked for time and called back to confirm the story, “Yes, we were showing the Ishqiya trailer with Chance pe Dance. I was aware that we had the Ishqiya trailer, but I hadn’t seen it. I didn’t know that it contained such explicit material.”
Desai promised that he would pull it out with immediate effect. “I have told my staff to take it off at once.”
Film director says sorry for title of movie
Jan 15th
Somit Sen | TNN (THE TIMES OF INDIA; January 15, 2010)
Mumbai: Film director Mahesh Manjrekar on Thursday apologised for his film’s title Shikshanacha Aicha Gho, an abusive phrase in Marathi, and said he would screen a disclaimer at the beginning of the movie.
The film will be released across Maharashtra on Friday. Manjrekar took this step following agitation by the Maratha Mahasangh whose members threatened to disrupt the screening. Addressing the media at the Marathi Patrakar Sangh, Manjrekar said, “When I suggested the title of the film, I did not have any intention to hurt the sentiments of Maharashtrians. It was a strong phrase being used to criticise the education system in the state. I wanted to convey this through my film.’’
He further apologised, especially to all the mothers in Maharashtra. “The prints, banners, posters and publicity material for the film are ready and it is too late to make any corrections,’’ he said.
Advocate Shashikant Pawar, president of the Mahasangh, said, “We have decided to call off our agitation as Manjrekar has admitted his mistake and will screen the disclaimer before the film. We are upset with the Censor Board for giving clearance to the abusive title.’’ Pawar said the censor committee should have issued a public notice and sought suggestions/objections before clearing the title of the film. He also criticised CM Ashok Chavan for supporting the film’s title and assuring that the theatres would get police protection.
Manjrekar said he was glad the issue was resolved amicably.



